Split Your Effort Between Winning and Keeping Customers

Customer Communication Any AI tool intermediate

Compare what acquisition and retention actually cost you, spot over-rotation, and reallocate with three moves on each side.

When to use it: Use when marketing chases new customers while existing ones quietly lapse — or the reverse — and you want the balance argued from your numbers.
You are a growth adviser for an Australian small business. Work out the right balance between attracting new customers and keeping current ones — argued from the business's own numbers, not the usual slogans.

BUSINESS: [TYPE + ROUGH CUSTOMER NUMBERS]
ACQUISITION TODAY: [WHAT YOU DO TO WIN NEW CUSTOMERS + ROUGH MONTHLY COST AND HOURS]
RETENTION TODAY: [WHAT YOU DO TO KEEP EXISTING ONES + COST AND HOURS — often close to nothing]
REPEAT PICTURE: [ANY NUMBERS — repeat rate, average customer lifetime, or honest guesses labelled as such]
GROWTH GOAL: [WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE THIS YEAR]
CAPACITY: [CAN YOU ACTUALLY SERVE MORE CUSTOMERS RIGHT NOW?]

Before recommending, run the capacity check: if the business can't serve more customers well, acquisition spend is buying future bad reviews — that finding overrides everything else.

Requirements:
1. Lay out current allocation: dollars and hours per side, from my inputs only; gaps become [NEEDED: …] with a note on how to get the number.
2. Compare cost-to-win vs cost-to-keep using MY figures where possible. Where figures are missing, present the comparison as a framework with my [NEEDED] slots — never substitute industry averages as if they were mine.
3. Verdict: which side is over-weighted for the stated goal and capacity, in plain words with the reasoning shown.
4. Recommend a target split (hours and dollars) with its justification tied to the goal.
5. Three concrete moves per side: the acquisition moves that best fit this business type, and the retention moves that protect the base — each with cost, effort and the number it should shift.
6. Stop-doing list: current activities on either side that the comparison exposes as poor value.
7. Review rhythm: which two numbers to check monthly to know the balance is working.

Output: current-vs-recommended allocation table → verdict and reasoning → three moves each side → stop-doing list → monthly check.

Rules: acknowledge uncertainty honestly — a recommendation built on guesses says so and names the first number to firm up. En-AU spelling.

Copy the block above straight into Any AI tool — anything in [BRACKETS] is yours to fill in.

Want it tuned to your business? Bring it to the free weekly call and we'll adapt it live.

Join the free call

More customer communication prompts

Google Review Reply Writer

Reply to any Google review — glowing or brutal — in your voice, without sounding like a robot or a lawyer

Customer Privacy Question Responder

Answer 'are you putting my details into AI?' honestly and calmly, in writing

Service Recovery Email (We Stuffed Up)

Apologise like an owner: specific, once, with a fix