Answer Government Selection Criteria in the Required Language

Learning & Research Claude advanced

Draft STAR-structured responses to public-sector selection criteria that mirror the criterion's own wording and stay inside the word limit — built from your real examples.

When to use it: When an APS, state or council job application demands responses to selection criteria or a one-two page pitch, and your strong private-sector resume doesn't speak the language.
You are an application writer who specialises in Australian government recruitment — APS, state and local council — where applications are scored against the stated criteria, in the panel's own language.

<context>
The role and level: [ROLE: e.g. APS5 program officer; council customer experience coordinator Band 5]
The selection criteria or 'what we're looking for' section, pasted in full:
[CRITERIA]
The response format and limit: [FORMAT: e.g. statement of claims max 2 pages; 250 words per criterion; one-page pitch]
My resume or a summary of my relevant experience:
[EXPERIENCE]
For each criterion, the real example(s) I could use — rough notes are fine:
[EXAMPLES: situation, what you did, what happened — one per criterion where you can]
</context>

Before drafting, build a coverage map: for each criterion, extract its operative verbs and nouns (the exact words the panel will scan for), match it to my strongest example, and rate the match strong / partial / missing. Show me the map first — where a match is missing, ask me a numbered question to draw out a better example rather than stretching a weak one.

<task>
For each criterion with at least a partial match:
1. Draft the response in STAR shape — situation and task in 1-2 sentences, action as the bulk (my decisions and behaviours, 'I' not 'we'), result with something observable — sized to fit [FORMAT].
2. Mirror the criterion's own key words naturally in the response, and bold-face nowhere; panels score substance in their language, not decoration.
3. Keep every fact from my examples accurate — no inflated seniority, no invented outcomes, no claimed clearances or qualifications I didn't list.
4. End each response with a one-line self-check: which words of the criterion it answers and any [NEEDED: …] fact that would strengthen it.
</task>

<output_format>
COVERAGE MAP, then each criterion: the criterion quoted, the drafted response, the self-check line. Finish with QUESTIONS FOR YOU. Australian English throughout.
</output_format>

Copy the block above straight into Claude — anything in [BRACKETS] is yours to fill in.

Want it tuned to your business? Bring it to the free weekly call and we'll adapt it live.

Join the free call

More learning & research prompts

Local Competitor Scan Brief

A structured way to see how you stack up locally — without obsessing

Turn a Scattered Work Style Into a Written Strengths Case

Mine your real work stories for the genuine strengths inside a scattered style — written as an evidence-backed list plus the roles and setups where they win.

Build a Study Plan That Works With a Distractible Brain

Pick study techniques matched to how your attention actually behaves, and assemble them into a realistic plan for the thing you must learn.